Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Haystack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Closing instructions

WikiProject Haystack
Failed attempt "to highlight the most essential in Wikipedia". Probably best removed to discourage this kind of unproductive experiment? --  Klein zach  04:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support deletion, as the initiator of the project, I agree with deletion. The project of summarizing vital articles can always be done later if anybody (e.g. me) gets interested again, and is not directly dependent on the existence of this page. Mikael Häggström (talk) 04:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:CSD#G7.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Or mark historical. Gigs (talk) 14:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * G7 per Mikael Umlaut's comment above. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Now speedied per G7. - Dank (push to talk) 23:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.