Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Ideologies

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Ideologies

 * – (View MfD)

created this last month after filing a request at WP:COUNCIL/P. The potential project has a one-to-one scope with WP:POLITICS, but either way this page was created prematurally (along with the many category pages). It only has one member. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 15:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - this project was created prematurally as per nom. There are no long term benefits of keeping this as historical, as there is nothing to reference. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Does what text at WikiProject Council/Proposals support deletion as a remedy for this? Is this process page even active?  Should the process page be archived?  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 19:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * It's been active enough, I'd say. It used to be much worse. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 18:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete A recent and inappropriate addition that is not helpful. Johnuniq (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete as largely duplicative and largely stillborn. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:39, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, but allow recreation by undeletion upon request. Abandoned proposal that was stillborn. No "largely" about it. Doug Mehus T · C  18:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.