Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam:The Muslim Guild/User comments/Zora


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedily Deleted as an attack page. &Euml;vilphoenix Burn! 02:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam:The Muslim Guild/User comments/Zora

 * Delete this page violates WP:NPA as the sole purpose seems to be to attack the User:Zora. Some of the comments there are just borderline racist/antisemtic.


 * ''Striver,


 * She's really not a Buddhist. Buddhists act nothing like what Zora does. She insults Siddhartha Gautama with her arrogant and hostile actions. She's a Buddhist wanna-be. Maybe somebody should teach her about the ethical conduct of the Eightfold Path, so that she wont make such a joke out of eastern faiths.


 * She's actually Jewish.' (see her last sentence here). She says she's against Zionists. But she's doing them the greatest favour by so viciously attacking the Shia (and others).--Zereshk 00:48, 10 November 2005 (UTC)'


 * Well, at least we know now that she's Jewish.--Zereshk 01:30, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * This is not the kind of thing that fellow Wikipedians like Zora should have to put up with. If you see the page, User:Striver keeps referring to Zora as "the Buddist Zora" over and over. This subpage should be deleted. I am also going to look for other subpages in this project made for the sole reason for personal attacks. Jersey Devil 18:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep Delete the offensive parts of the page, i agree that parts of it are neither constructive nor helpfull. But no reason to delete the entire subpage. That page is usefull for addresing the comunity with issues relevant to Zora, in the same way as this: Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam:The Muslim Guild/User comments/Striver. --Striver 21:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Also, now that you brought Zereshk's comment, why did'nt you bring my comment? This is what i answered when Zereshk wrote that:
 * ''That is a serious allegation to say she is lying about that... What makes you come to that conclusion? Not that i have anything against Jews, i love Jews...

Failing to bring my answer to the uncivil remark could lead people to get the wrong idea, and i hope that wasn't your motiv.

I removed the personal remarks that you righteusly perceived as bad faith. But you should have done that via talk page, the proper venur, not cloging the afd prosedure.

Again, there is no real difference bettwen this page and the other "user comments" page in the Muslim guild. Please use the appropriate venue to address problems instead of avd'ing wantonly--Striver 23:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete as a blatant violation of NPA and a subpage devoted entirely to attacking another editor. Pegasus1138 Talk 23:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

This is not created to "attack", rather to raise and document valid issues. The issues would not be raised if they where not perceived as serious enough, and that could lead to the conclusion that it is a attack page. I mean, how is a comment page supposed to comment perceived bad behavior? Isnt a RFC page a "blatant violation of NPA" by the same token? This a efford to document and deal with those issues on a larger than personal scale, whithout taking even more serious steps such as a RFC--Striver 00:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * You talk to her on her (and your) TALK pages. A page like this in namespace would still be pointless if it were perfectly polite.  When it starts to say mean things, it becomes speediable. Xoloz 01:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Strongest, Speedy Delete This is an attack, speediable immediately, creating for no other purpose than to harass. Xoloz 01:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment, I love how Striver attempts to place the blame on me when he does something wrong. I am being "uncivil" and should have "handled this on the talk page" so I am the one at fault. Now he has put up another Rfc against me. The fact is that you also went around saying "buddist Zora" throughout that page trying to ridicule her as a "fake buddist". So don't try and play innocent. Attacking others on the basis of religion is a serious offense.--Jersey Devil 01:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.