Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Jackass

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep and label inactive, for historical purposes. Note: already tagged with the more severe "defunct". Rich Farmbrough, 13:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC).

WikiProject Jackass
If deleted the following templates should also be deleted: recommend this project be deleted and if any articles are found to link to it (which I couldn't find any) then they be redirected elsewhere. This project is inactive and even if it wasn't there is not enough topic to warrant its own project. Kumioko (talk) 01:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Template:WikiProject Jackass
 * Template:User WikiProject Jackass
 * Delete-- nothing since 2007. -- E♴  (talk)  13:56, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete-- per above. -- Klein zach  02:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep another one on the light side of having content worth keeping, but I think it's there. Tag as inactive and move along. -- Ned Scott 09:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep to preserve the history on the talk page. For example: Is Stephanie Hodge notable enough to warrant her own page? I can't see there existing a substantial piece of work or smaller mutilple sources existing to satisfy WP:ATT. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  00:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I seem to recall the broken back getting some press... but if the sources aren't out there you could try prodding it.  Dei z  talk 02:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Google only turned up a brief mention by Johnny Knoxville in an interview. Lexis Nexis and Proquest did not turn up any news stories for her, only a comedienne by the same name. I don't really want to delete it myself, I think her role in Jackass's development might be notable (Knoxville said after she was injured they felt really bad and decided no girls in the stunts). I would rather beef it up, its just the web sources seem scarce. Hopefully more will turn up eventually. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  03:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd say it should be kept, obviously she played a part in the show and I too remember reading about her broken back due to one of the stunts, plus you see her a couple of times as part of the Jackass crew in the "We Want Fun" Andrew WK video. Sure it's not a reason in itself but to me it shows she was still considered part of the crew. Stuey 182 01:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * My final verdict in pure wiki-fallacy is that if the Rick Kosick article is kept, so too shall Stephanie Hodge. Should one be deleted I will personally prod the other. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  08:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Chanceska (talk) 23:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * if anyone cares,I just found this current, somewhat in-depth article all about Stephanie Hodge.. I notice there is no wiki page about her (the only one I saw was for a stand-up comedienne of the same name) and I'm not sure if she's notable enough to even have a wiki article (after reading the above section, it seems as if there was once one, but other than the above convo, I didn't see any other evidence of one ever existing) but thought I would post the link anyways, just for those who may be interested http://www.asylum.com/2010/10/25/stephanie-hodge-jackass-accident/

I believe the benefits of keeping this page tagged as historical outweigh any downsides. Cunard (talk) 23:28, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as dead project lacking substantial or useful history. I'm not sure a brief preliminary discussion before a successful AfD warrants keeping this. Bob House 884 (talk) 22:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Any discourse related to encyclopedia building ought to be kept. There is a comment above at 23:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC) that reveals that Stephanie Hodge has received in-depth coverage in an article since the page's deletion. To delete this helpful comment, which could, in the future, lead to the article's being recreated, is detrimental to the encyclopedia. I stand by my position to keep the WikiProject and its associated talk page. Cunard (talk) 03:45, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It might not address your concerns, but I have shifted the comment with a brief explanation of context to Talk: Jackass (TV series), seems like a better place for it anyway (as in more watchers). I don't think theres anything else which ought to be kept. Bob House 884 (talk) 15:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * That's a good solution to this problem. More practical than hanging on to these dead pages that no-one will ever read. -- Klein zach  01:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for shifting the content to a better-watched area. However, because this WikiProject was once active, I cannot support deletion. There are multiple threads at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jackass worthy of preservation. Another example:

Just expanded the Manny Puig artical if anyone can get a better picture then i would be greatful mines really pixilated King Alaric 11:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your efforts. I did notice, however, that you sourced most of your information from Myspace and that a lot of it seems to be speculative or original research. I won't touch it right now to give you a chance to properly cite it, but please read wikipedia's standards of verifiability for an understanding of wikipedia's requirements for citations and sources. Thanks again, &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  12:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

OK i'll look through the artical again and try to find some other places to send references to insted of myspace. The reason i linked it to myspace was mainly because the official sites said nothing, and Manny wrote the myspace himself so it should be correct. King Alaric 11:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The problem with myspace is that there are a large number of fake profiles out there, so it is difficult to verify it is actually the subject writing it. Instances come to mind where articles have cited myspace yet the stars have repeatedly said they don't have a myspace, such as Bam Margera and Howard Stern. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  16:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

While many of the sections on this talk page could be shifted to each article to which it refers, valuable history of the discourse's taking place would be deleted. The users who made those comments would have no record of them in their contribution histories. The benefits of keeping the WikiProject (preserving history pertaining to building the encyclopedia and preserving a WikiProject that, once active, may become active again) far outweigh the marginal benefits of deleting it. Cunard (talk) 07:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:INACTIVEWP, there is enough history to this project that it should be kept for historical purposes. Monty  845  18:32, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark inactive. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 16:01, 18 April 2011 (UTC)