Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses/Articles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was redirect to main WikiProject page. This achieves deletion's effect of dropping it off the radar while making it possible to look into the project's history or resurrect the page if necessary. &mdash;harej (talk) (cool!) 18:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses/Articles
Seems to have been abandoned. Does not match current project structure and has had no substantial changes in a significant period. Was raised for discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Jehovah's_Witnesses over two weeks ago with no response. Jeffro 77 (talk) 13:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete if such is requested. The purpose of creating the list, I think, was to provide a list of articles directly relevant to the project which could then be used with the recent changes function to let members keep up on any changes to articles relevant to the project, but I'm not necessarily sure that it has really lived up to that purpose. John Carter (talk) 14:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing worth keeping here, clearly no one will miss it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Surely this is a matter for the project. If they do not want it, then they can just ask an admin to delete it. We should not do this kind of interference with Projects even if no one will miss it. So keep but perhaps tag as historic. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  23:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, not all of these articles are tagged. This is of great importance to the project if someone went throught the time to create it. Why don't we notify the creator of this so that we can get his opinion. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If there were any benefit in using the page as a source for checking whether pages are tagged, it would need to be completely overhauled first, as it is not accurately representative of the project. The creator of the page, User:John Carter, has already commented above.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 07:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * This isn't a very big project, so it is unlikely that editors will be swarming around the project page. I would suggest that someone actually contacts a few active editors to see their response. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.