Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses/Links: watchtower.org to jw.org

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses/Links: watchtower.org to jw.org


This stale project-related page appears to have been abandoned by its creator. Jeffro 77 (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - as far as I can tell, the research that went into the page is still valid.  The wikiproject is semi-active and the page itself is not causing any harm. --Whpq (talk) 18:02, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * A number of the articles that I checked so far no longer have the original link/source at all. Many of the 'suggestions' have no suggested alternative target. There are bots that take care of linking to archive sites. I will check the remainder of the referenced articles as time permits, and then the page will no longer have any purpose. Note that this discussion only relates to the subpage, not the JW WikiProject.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 07:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note I have reviewed the page and removed entries for articles where there was no current reference to the old website. The only article that still has any links to the old watchtower.org website already has archive links present. This WikiProject subpage no longer serves any purpose.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 07:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The page along with its history is still an historical artifact of the wikiproject. I see no good reason to remove this. -- Whpq (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The subpage was created simply to clean up links to an old website. That has been done. The page now serves no purpose. There is no special 'historical' significance to the fact that articles once pointed to an old website.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 01:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Nomination by a main contributor of the project, old maintenance page which is obsolete. If wanting to see the current coverage of an old link, a simple insource or link search can be used. — Paleo  Neonate  – 18:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per Paleo's reasoning. We don't need to keep every scratch pad. Legacypac (talk) 12:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.