Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Karaims

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:10, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Karaims


This is not a real project. It was created by User:Kaz as part of a move discussion, see Talk:Crimean Karaites. The only contributing user member was Kaz, who has been indefinitely blocked (1) for disruption, (2) for sock-puppetry. The other two editors (Special:Contributions/Muthmar and Special:Contributions/Danage) have not contributed.--Toddy1 (talk) 16:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Congratulations Toddy1 on identifying the sockpuppetry of the user, reporting it on the right board, and getting it banned from Wikipedia. You also proved that these other two users were just sockpuppets of the same main user, anyhow, and that should be mentioned here. This so-called "project" was just another one of the schemes setup by the sockpuppet master Kaz. It should be expurged from Wikipedia ASAP. I won't even start editing the articles that need extensive improvement in the area of Karaite history until the threat of this sockpuppet master is definitevely eliminated from the environment. It takes a great deal of knowledge and time to master all these little functional details of the complex wiki environment. I prefer to just concentrate on getting the reliable sources right to be able to contribute to the overall historical reliability of Wikipedia articles. I just don't have the time to try and master the myriad technical details needed, but I am happy to see that some people can master and apply them, as you do. The encyclopedia could not work without this type of contribution either. Kudos! warshytalk 17:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete we normally mark them historical but there's nothing worth saving here, and saving it would just be a shrine to a disruptive user. WP:DENY Gigs (talk) 23:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The WikiProject won't meet the requirements of WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProject and there's no history worth keeping. Delete. WP:DENY is another reason to delete. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 02:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Normally wikiprojects are tagged as historical or made into taskforces, but it looks like this wikiproject was created to disruptively make a WP:POINT during a content dispute.--SGCM (talk)  11:28, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is no secret that this WikiProject was Kaz's personal toy from the very beginning, just like the similiar stuff he created for himself in Wikipedia. Nozdref (talk) 17:26, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. A note to editors !voting with support instead of delete, XfD discussions use keep or delete instead of support or oppose. Using support may confuse the closing administrator, as it is ambiguous, and could indicate support for keeping or deleting. Thank you.--SGCM (talk)  02:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.