Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Khitan (3rd nomination)




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  userfy. delldot  &nabla;.  00:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Khitan
Inactive project of narrow scope with only one IP member. Previous MfD closed as keep back at the start of February, but there's been no sign of activity at this project since then. --PC78 (talk) 19:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy Though it really hasn't been worked on since May, I have to agree with what was said in the 2nd nomination in that the article creator may be an "annual" editor, so we should give the benefit of the doubt to the editor and userfy the project. ArcAngel (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The sole IP member hasn't edited since June 2008. Do we userfy pages for IP editors? PC78 (talk) 20:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly "Userfy". Projects are intended to be a basis of collaboration, and no project with only one member is a collaboration. It also has a very limited scope and seems to take as its sole source a single book. There are other projects extant which cover this same subject area, and there is no reason that I can see why this one-man show should be kept. John Carter (talk) 20:04, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per John Carter. Inactive, extremely limited scope, never really got off the ground, only one member, etc. I don't support userfying in this case because, to the best of my knowledge, that's never done for IP users.... A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I am also amenable to userfying at this point, since Yug has requested that the page be moved to his userspace rather than being deleted (see below). A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 20:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, or Userfy:
 * Contributor: The IP is me (Yug (talk) ), the creator of the page. I still hope to work on this one day, but that's not my top priority. *# Userfy: Don't delete ! This page is useful, and the subject have still space for expansion. The project page make an overview of the field, and a new contributors will appreciate this abstract, to continue the work.
 * Subject's importance: The Khitans have been as powerful and important in history as the Song dynasty. The Song dynasty have been study a lot because of nationalism, but Khitans are as important, and the field will expand.
 * Sources: John Carter, your statement is wrong. There are several sources. But one is underlined since immediately available online.
 * Don't delete. If need, userfy the page in my space. Yug (talk)  07:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.