Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Lordi




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Tim Song (talk) 14:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Lordi
"WikiProject" with only 1 (one) edit by the sole participant, who has a grand total of 14 edits, the last in December 2009. Rd232 talk 14:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unlike other inactive projects, which showed some initial signs of organization, and should have some minimal process before deleting, this one never really got started, and has no activity. Nothing is lost if this is nixed.-- SPhilbrick  T  22:38, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, stillborn Wikiproject with only one inactive member. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Wait December 2009 is not all that long ago. Collect (talk) 12:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You're kidding, right? Did you actually look at the page? Rd232 talk 14:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I tend to feel that 6 months is a reasonable period before declaring something dead on WP - having looked at several dozen very active editors in the past who started off with hiatuses that long or longer. Collect (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * (a) there's nothing worth saving on the page (b) the sole participant made only 14 edits (c) there's nothing worth saving (d) band-specific wikiprojects have a worrying tendency to die even with much greater participation and much more famous subjects (e) there's nothing worth saving. It's not even remotely userfy territory - it's more like WP:CSD territory. But I thought I'd better MFD it. PS "declare it dead"? when was it alive, exactly? Rd232 talk 15:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Anecdotal evidence to the contrary, there's zero chance of this being resurrected. The subject space is only ~20 articles in total anyway. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:35, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete project was never active and it's main page does not even identify the subject. Would be easy to start up again in the should interest grow.  Them From  Space  20:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, definitely not an active project, and marking as historical would greatly overstate this page's usefulness. Nyttend (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.