Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Myrtle Beach

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:32, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Myrtle Beach


This project has only 15 members. Whats more there are 37 articles in this project which is too narrow, like WikiProject MythBusters and WikiProject Lilo & Stitch which was deleted after having a narrow WikiProject. JJ98 (Talk)  23:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete-- per nom. Nothing significant on talk page, no edits in a year. -- E♴  (talk)  23:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Mark as inactive and keep - a metro area of ~300,000 people is fertile ground for many articles. If folks feel a greater sense of community contributing with a platform such as this then it is a good idea. I oppose deletion of any material which is a barrier to collaborative editing, which underpins much of what we do here. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge into the state project as a task force - Although I agree with Casliber that this could be useful and could be kept as inactive the low number of articles makes me think its not needed along with the low activity since its creation. After looking at the template as well it appears to be a long inactive project that could be rolled up into the State project. So I am ok with it either way. Also after reviewing a couple of them that are tagged they seem to have had the tag when they were created years ago. Although this may not be the case for all of them. --Kumioko (talk) 01:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete -- per nom. Clearly far too narrow. Opposing retention of redundant material — per Wikipedia is not a dumping ground. -- Klein zach  06:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to WP South Carolina, as a taskforce or just a redirect. 184.144.168.112 (talk) 07:14, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep but tag inactive with parent=WikiProject_South_Carolina or preferably redirect with history intact to WikiProject_South_Carolina. The scope is not so bad, and future editors may find the start useful.  LEave any merging to an interest wikiProject member.  I haven't discovered what is redundant, but the large number of external links look too promotional to be left like that.  The other WikiProject claiming a relationship, WikiProject_Cities seems more interested in capital cities, and less interested in smaller cities like this.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.