Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject PBSKids/to do

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Note nominator's block as a sock. T. Canens (talk) 00:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject PBSKids/to do
This article is on the main progect page and does not need to be here. Checker Fred (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I notice that page was just created yesterday. Is it possible someone has decided the To-Do list belongs on a subpage and they just haven't completed the task? Plus, shouldn't the editor who created the page be notified?-- SPhilbrick  T  17:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The person had no explanation on doing this.Checker Fred (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment What, exactly, is wrong with the page? Many projects have subpages that contain to-do lists like this because they can be easily placed on multiple other pages. I only find it to be an advantage for the project to have that page. On another note, nothing was wrong when Hidividedby5 placed the to-do list in the "Open tasks" section of WikiProject PBSKids; you cited that you reverted their edit because the edit deleted content. As far as I can tell, the to-do list simply placed everything from the "Open tasks" section into a neater format, without actually removing anything. ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 18:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep It would seem that someone is trying to move the to-do list to a subpage, and isn't done yet.   Hi 8 7 8   (Come yell at me!) 19:27, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This page appears to have a useful purpose, although it is a bit misplaced at the moment.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 20:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * the revert she made, I didn't see an explanation from her or a link to this page. It just might need some clean up but at the time I did not think this page was necessary.Checker Fred (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.