Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Panic! at the Disco




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was preserving as redirect/taskforce. @harej 22:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Panic! at the Disco
This defunct project was closed and redirected to WikiProject Emo. I had proposed on the project's talk page that it be converted into a task force, and there were no objections, but upon further consideration I saw so little activity on both the project & talk pages, and so few articles in the scope, that even a task force seemed unnecessary and would probably have gone unused. No one's piped up to voice any objection to the redirect, so I feel safe saying that the project is completely defunct and unused. All of the ancilliary stuff related to the project (templates, etc.) were already deleted when the project was redirected; all that's left is the project page and IMO there's nothing there worth keeping for historical reference (really just a brief conversation about an old demo song on the talk page). Not much history either, certainly not anything worth keeping. --IllaZilla (talk) 17:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Archive as a subpage somewhere in WP:EMO; someone may resurrect it as a taskforce some day, and it's easier to unarchive than undelete. → ROUX   ₪  17:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Concur with roux; not much value in deletion. Skomorokh  17:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Not much value in archiving, either. This is the old content. Really nothing there to archive: basically a "this project's goal is to improve Panic at the Disco articles", followed by a list of members (only 4 or 5 of whom appear to still be active on WP). So basically we would be archiving...a bunch of section headers. Even if this thing was resurrected as a task force it would need to be redone from the ground up, so what's the point? --IllaZilla (talk) 17:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.