Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Panorama Welding

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Merge to Picture_tutorial. I will redirect; interested editors can transfer whatever portions of material they think are useful on the target page. --RL0919 (talk) 12:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Panorama Welding
Self-described 'mini project' started in 2006 with material moved from a user's page. Never had any formal organization. -- Klein zach  01:46, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete-- per nom. -- E♴  (talk)  14:52, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Changed to Merge below. -- E♴  (talk)  22:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep User:John Reid's post on the talk page alone is worth keeping. -- Ned Scott 09:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename What Kleinzach writes in his nomination is true; however, I agree with Ned Scott that this material is potentially valuable and worth keeping. I would suggest userfying the page for John Reid; unfortunately, he's been inactive since 2006. Therefore, my best solution is to keep this but move it to, say, Panorama welding, so the material is preserved in the project namespace for other users who might be interested. Modifications could easily be made to the text of the page, through editing, to make this an informational page and not a non-starter WikiProject. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfying would have been an option. I don't think elevating it into Panorama welding is a good idea in its present form. Could it be merged with Picture_tutorial? -- Klein zach  00:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * That's probably a better idea than renaming; the information here is absent on that page, and it would fit well. I'd be willing to do the merger myself, if you agree that it should be done. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm happy with that, but perhaps we have to wait for someone to close this? -- Klein zach  09:40, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I suppose we do. In the meantime, I'll ask Ned and E2eamon to take a second look at this. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, let's merge the useful information to Picture_tutorial. Sounds like a good idea. --  E♴  (talk)  22:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.