Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Places Named Eva

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Snow delete. Based on discussion to date, this is disruption identical to the previous deleted "wikiproject" by this "not here" contributor. Little desire for keeping. Closing early per snow and DENY. BusterD (talk) 10:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Places Named Eva

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This is the second WikiProject created by this editor. While this particular WikiProject has a clear scope (unlike WikiProject Peanut The Dog), I feel this scope is too small to be a useful WikiProject. Eva only encompasses 11 articles. – Novem Linguae (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * It is good faith I started it for my family and friendsWidget-Policy Thy Editor (talk) 01:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: The solution to inactive WikiProjects isn't deletion. If this fails to gain members, it can be marked with . Zerbu  💬 02:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Stipulated topic is WP:TRIVIA. silvia  (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)  (inquire within)  02:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Scope is silly and absurd for a project. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 08:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete what? Huh? Dronebogus (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Should be a section in Talk:Eva in which people can provide their findings there. Does not need to gather a group of people. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cleaning up after a deleted WikiProject isn't especially fun (look at User:Alalch E./CSD log starting with #43). Thankfully no templates and categories have been created for this one. On this ocassion, my message to the world is: Please don't create WikiProjects that need to be literally deleted. —Alalch E. 20:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Simply nonsense. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Absurd scope of a WikiProject. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete bizarre WikiProject that isn't helpful for anything. Partofthemachine (talk) 18:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment The user who created this page is suspected of sockpuppetry, see Sockpuppet investigations/Widget-policyq229. Partofthemachine (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete — see also Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 22.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.