Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon/Style


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Marked as historical/kept, solely for the sake of the record. Xoloz 14:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Pokémon/Style
This page is out dated. The stuff are being merged. And believe me, the manual of style for the lists can't be big enough to deserve its own page. TheBlazikenMaster 20:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete::You beat me to it. I've already removed the page from the PCP page. Spigot  Map  22:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Tag it as historical and let's leave it alone. I personally like seeing the good ol' MOS back when all the speices had their own articles. hbdragon88 22:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - not doing any harm hanging around on a WikiProject subpage. Lots of potentially useful information, and the already-present Template:Out of date tag should prevent any misuse of it. — xDanielx T/C 08:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Esperanzafy. Consign the guide to history, provide a brief historical explanation of what it was, and let it be. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.