Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Programming Blocks

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 21:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Programming Blocks


A project without any support or backing through discussion and showing little interest from the community. With such a narrow focus, at best it should be a task force for WikiProject Television, at worst it's an invitation to introduce WP:FANCRUFT to articles that might be included in the project. Appears to be a "create and run" project by its creator, User:TBrandley, who hasn't attempted to introduce, maintain, promote, or find others interested in helping with the project. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 02:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and block editor per WP:DISRUPT and WP:IDHT. Logical Cowboy (talk) 03:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Everything here is already covered in much better (and less minute detail) by WP:TV, and programming blocks are something mainly of interest only to network schedulers and television historians (for instance, everyone remembers ABC's TGIF, but nobody cares about CBS's competing Friday Night Block Party or ABC's 2000 Friday night adult comedy block nobody watched). Judging from the small list of blocks included here, a task force at best would only attract a few editors, at most.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Well-intentioned but ultimately a bad idea. There's no need to split this from the TV project given the very narrow scope and the fact that a significant portion of these articles don't really have the potential to ever be more than a short list anyways. This would probably be shot down if it was proposed (as it should have been) at WikiProject Council/Proposals. Pichpich (talk) 10:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and Logical Cowboy  Jay Jay Talk to me 17:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete this page plus all the related templates, categories, etc. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete, possibly speedy, per above. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong delete I'm not even sure I'd call this "well-intentioned", as a glance at the user's other contributions and interactions with other editors indicates they're quite the opposite of well-intentioned. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only participant is its creator, User:TBrandley, who is indefinitely blocked. TJRC (talk) 20:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.