Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Projectboxes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. This MFD thread already has more content than that project.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  09:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Projectboxes
Inactive project. One member. Almost everything to be decided. SLSB  talk ER 00:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 
 * Initiate controlled closure - probably not a good idea for a project, but if this one is to be closed down, do it properly. See WikiProject Projectboxes/Catalogue and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Projectboxes for some snippets of discussion that should be archived somewhere, probably at WikiProject Council, so that people know that the idea is not new. Carcharoth 01:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to endorse deletion of this one. Seems to have been a zany one man project that never got started. I note that the user in question (User:Zocky) has been notified and is still an active Wikipedian; if he doesn't come and speak up for the project I think we should delete it. --kingboyk 12:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ambivalent I think it's a good idea to have one place where people can find useful things to put on their userpage, but it's obviously not a very popular or active project. Zocky | picture popups 22:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete inactive. Zocky you can always recreate it if you find users who want to help.  T Rex  |  talk  10:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If there is the possibility of recreation, it is best to leave marked inactive. Deleted pages can be cleared from the archives without warning by the developers. Recreation of deleted pages is only meant for deletions that were inappropriate and need to be overturned. Deletion should not be thought of as a way of archiving something for retrieval 5 years later. Carcharoth 01:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.