Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality spot check

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep for history. Possible redirection is left to editorial discretion. --RL0919 (talk) 14:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Quality spot check
Four member project that existed in 2005-2006. No discussions. Only substantial relic is the subpage: WikiProject Quality spot check/Lists. (There's also WikiProject Quality spot check/General.) -- Klein zach  12:00, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as Historical We don't usually delete defunct wikiprojects unless there's a good reason. Gigs (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as tagged. Was active.  Scope was OK.  Could be revived.  Has a substantial subpage.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The only thing this project did was to record comments like "Mostly decent little article" and "Average stub". (Pre-dating assessments?) Can you explain why you think the "scope was OK", and why — after the passage of 5 years — it "could be revived"? Thanks. -- Klein zach  23:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This project was an early effort on article assessment. We still do article assessment, and so the history is still relevant.  I don’t seem to be able to easily find a WikiProject on article assessment; the most relevant thing appears to be Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment.  I recommend Keep, and redirect with history intact to Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment on editorial discretion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.