Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Reader

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Redirect to WikiProject Fact and Reference Check. --RL0919 (talk) 00:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Reader
Proposal for a project that started and died in 2006. Aim was "to add a large number of reasonable quality references to Wikipedia as quickly as possible . . .". Had three initial members. A couple of sentences of discussion. No subpages. -- Klein zach  01:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect with history intact to WikiProject Fact and Reference Check as an archive for those who go looking for this old stuff. I don't think that it should be deleted, but agree that it is not a WikiProject.  It is an interesting, not unreasonable idea for the good of the project.  Gives some historical perspective on what people were thinking back then.  The idea of reading important source documents, and combing for citable information, is a good one.  I believe it is largely done for some sources, such as Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th_edition.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect with history intact to WikiProject Fact and Reference Check per above. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 15:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.