Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  No consensus. --RL0919 (talk) 22:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers
Project started in 2007 which only lasted a matter of months. There were 43 members but hardly any discussions. Many subpages: -- Klein zach  06:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/COTW
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/Newsletter
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/Newsletter/August 2007
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/Newsletter/January 2008
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/Newsletter/July 2007
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/Newsletter/June 2007
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/Newsletter/September 2007
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/Outreach/March 2007 Newsletter
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/Outreach/May 2007 Newsletter
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/announcements
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/articles
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/categories
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/participants
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/quicklinks
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/scope
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/tasks
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/templates
 * WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers/to do
 * Delete all per nom. Project has been dead much longer than it was ever alive. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 07:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as tagged. Worthy of revival.  There is a significant amount of organisational resource, and no reason to delete.  The depth of talk page discussions is not important.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Re. "significant amount of organisational resource", which pages are you referring to? -- Klein zach  12:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Tag with template:dormant or template:inactive. RHCP are notable enough that there is a reasonable likelihood of >2 editors at some time in the future getting together to work on articles. There is no nothing to be gained by deleting this. Arguments about overspecialisation are not valid. It all depends on what level editors want to work on. All a wikiproject is is a nexus and discussion point. Hypothetically, five editors could want to work on RHCP articles but be uninterested in rock music collaborations per se. Deleting this is not going to magically make them interested in a broader wikiproject. Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:55, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Non-starter project. MoondogCoronation (talk) 11:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Convert to WP:ALM taskforce While I normally have !voted delete (in these music-Wikiproject deletion discussions), I know that WP:RHCP was highly active a couple of years ago, with users NSR77 and Grim-Gym churning out a number of FAs. It'd be nice to preserve the effort in some way.—indopug (talk) 02:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.