Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Redirect/writing a good redirect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete, already BJAODN by Orderinchaos.  Daniel Bryant  22:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Redirect/writing a good redirect

 * Also WikiProject Redirect - writing a good redirect (ironically, a redirect!)

Utterly useless, one line page that does not say anything about writing a good redirect. Fails CSD A1 in my opinion but as it's not an article, I sent it here DanielT5 17:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete In full agreement with your comments. thewinchester 17:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Borderline WP:BJAODN.  &mdash;dgies tc 19:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Normally the only reasons I create redirects is that someone (often me) tried to accidentally link to an article and hit a redlink, or that an article has non-ASCII characters (although there are other reasons). These redirects are likely to be more useful than attempts to generate typos... --ais523 12:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Copied to BJAODN. Orderinchaos78 13:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia should not be filled with redirects for every typo imaginable. Curtmack of the Asylum 18:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per Curtmack's statement.--Wiki Fanatic | Talk 08:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.