Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Senses Fail




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. @harej 22:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Senses Fail
Same as the below nomination of WikiProject Panic at the Disco, basically. A defunct project that was closed & redirected to WP:EMO with no objections. All attendant templates, etc. were deleted, only the project page & talk page remain. Neither has any content worth archiving. Here was the content prior to redirecting: a very minimal list of goals/tasks ("improve every article") and a short list of participants, onlyl 2 of whom appear to still be active on WP. Talk page content consists of only 3 comments: 1 announcing the project, another saying it's inactive, and then me suggesting it be redirected to the Emo project. Nothing at all worth saving; even if it were resurrected as a task force down the line it would pretty much have to be rebuilt from the ground up anyway. --IllaZilla (talk) 20:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - scope too small for Wikiproject and inbound links appear to be low-value (mostly from the navbox from which I've removed the link). –xenotalk 20:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Shouldn't this be at redirects for discussion? I think it's a decent redirect FWIW. GrooveDog (oh hai.) 19:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a redirect now, but underneath that there's still an old project page that was barely used and will probably never be used again. How is it a "decent redirect"? Almost nothing links to it, and certainly nothing in the article or article talk spaces. Just some userspace links and links from other projects. RfD is for "problematic redirects". This one isn't "problematic" really, just entirely useless. Nobody's going to search for "WikiProject Senses Fail", and even if we resurrected it as a task force it would be as a subpage of the parent project and would need to be rebuilt from scratch in order to be useful. There's precisely zero worth keeping here. --IllaZilla (talk) 21:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.