Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Suffolk and Essex

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Suffolk and Essex
Created without discussion at WP:WPPRO. No members. Never edited save by its creator. Linking Suffolk and Essex together in one project is an arbitrary decision by the creator which is not logical and does not reflect any known county grouping. See also the archived WikiProject Council/Proposals/Norfolk and Suffolk which touches on the geo-politics of the Eastern Counties and suggests in order to be sustainable any project would probably need to encompass either all Eastern England or East Anglia at a minimum. nancy 18:55, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - The whole idea of having the WP:WPPRO is to prevent Wikipedia projects being created unilaterally like this. It's not always easy to get enough support to start projects for English counties. I'm well aware of these problems, because I created one county project and I'm a member of several others. If projects haven't been created yet for either Suffolk or Essex, it's because the time is not right, and experienced editors have deferred on it. --Kudpung (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom and Kudpung who appear to have said it all.--J3Mrs (talk) 16:54, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, created out of process, arbitrary choices. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.