Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Collaboration/April 2007

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 12:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Collaboration/April 2007

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Several WikiProject sub-pages that are no longer referenced and are over a decade old. WP:Cruft Mjquinn_id (talk) 18:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Mark Historical - We don't need to waste time on deleting coprolites. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep/mark historical (if you must) per Robert McClenon. I actually have found old pages like that useful; for instance, I linked to Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight/History/Archive 2005 in my personal Wikipedia timeline. Graham87 (talk) 08:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I've added relevant links from WikiProject Tennis/Cleanup; they were removed in August 2012 after a page move. Graham87 (talk) 09:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep wonderful documentation of past initiatives to get certain tennis player's articles to A-class/FA.—Alalch E. 16:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep and I question the need to even mark these as historical. Wikiproject Tennis is a currently active wikiproject and I see no need to go around slapping historical tags on what are essentially archives of an active wikiproject. -- Whpq (talk) 13:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I see the nominator is a member of WikiProject Tennis. This is probably something that should be discussed in-house first. They could be redirected or marked historical if no longer useful; deletion is unnecessary. I don't see the relevance of WP:CRUFT here. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.