Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject The Fairly OddParents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Moved to taskforce, as that's what consensus was calling for so I just boldly did it myself. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject The Fairly OddParents
This project was tagged as inactive after only 6 months. Given its very short "life", I'd say that this was a pretty much DOA wikiproject. Its corresponding templates are all either deleted or about to be (they never had an actual wikiproject template, for crying out loud), I don't see anything worth saving here. The Fairly OddParents articles can always fall under the jurisdiction of WP:NICK which is far more active. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Taskforcify - discuss with potential parent project, see what they want to do with it. // roux    16:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think taskforcing it would be a good idea as all the other Nick taskforces (Rocko's Modern Life, Invader Zim and Avatar: The Last Airbender) are all dead too. Moving it to a taskforce won't help anything as it was never really started. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Look, we know how much you love deleting things. Drop it in the lap of the parent wikiproject, as they are vastly more interested in deciding what to do with it. The project causes zero harm as it is right now; turning it into a sub-unit of WP:NICK is the logical step for easy recreation later. // roux    21:38, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - This wikiproject is inacticve. Also, the subject of the wikiproject is already covered in the Nickelodeon wikiproject. JS (chat) 16:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Leave as tagged as inactive. It does no harm being left as is, especially because it isn't in mainspace, and it could potentially be restarted at a later date. NW&#39;s Public Sock (talk) 21:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Even if it's almost totally redundant to WP:NICK? Redundant wikiprojects are hardly useful. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:36, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, the Nick Wikiproject attracts from all ranges of the spectrum, from those who like Nick Jr to those who like George Lopez. This is more specific, and could help future users out. To give a realted example, ther eis no way I could have found User:Haha169 and User:Rau J without the specific Avatar Task Force, if I had been forced to try to advertise on WP:NICK. - NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  00:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Good point. Taskforce-ifying probably wouldn't hurt, but at the same time, it would be just as easy to wipe this out and create a new taskforce. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Why delete instead of move? Sheesh. // roux    01:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Taskforcify, if that's even a word. :P Deletion is unnecessary though. Glass  Cobra  16:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Convert to Taskforce I think it's better to move this to the parent Wikiproject than outright deletion.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag historical, or merge to the Nick WP as a task force. Stifle (talk) 13:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Convert to task force and redirect. I agree this should be takforcified, as for which WikiProject either WP:TV of WP:NICK is fine by me. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  16:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.