Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject The Flaming Lips (2nd nomination)




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject The Flaming Lips
Stillborn Wikiproject. Only ever had 10 members. Two had no edits other than adding their name to the project; two haven't edited since 2007; one hasn't edited since 2008; one hasn't edited since December 2009. That's not very good numbers at all. The project accomplished absolutely nothing ever, and there is no relevant discussion of any kind on the talkpage except bot assessments.

What do we gain from keeping around a Wikiproject for "historical purposes" if it never did anything? I know we don't gain or lose any space from deleting a whole project, but there's just nothing worth keeping here. All of the articles pertaining to the band are sufficiently covered by the wider scope of the alternative music WikiProject. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Scope too narrow. :(  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 08:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete; the otters have a good point about this project never doing anything. Nyttend (talk) 03:17, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and previous comments. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.