Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Time to Think

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Time to Think


Project started, but never developed, in November 2007. No members, no discussions. Nothing worth saving. (Initiator also disappeared in November 2007.) Recommend Delete. -- Klein zach  05:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Kleinzach. No activity. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  06:12, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment isn't there another wikiproject that does this also? 65.94.47.63 (talk) 04:42, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or reinstate the historical tag from 2010 - I am  wondering if people are even realy reading over the pages they put up for deletion. I see above one nomination reason is because it has no members - yet on the projects page its say in yellow  so all can see This is not a membership WikiProject Moxy (talk) 07:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * may as well delete as this has gone nowhere. An alternative would be to turn this into an essay at WP:time to think Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:13, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep but change to essay. There a few links to it (including Motto of the day/April 19, 2011 to one of the redirects) so it is used occasionally - but it isn't something that would usually be described as a WikiProject. Peter E. James (talk) 18:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The page mainly consists of little boxes. What would be the content of the essay in your view? -- Klein zach  00:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.