Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/Articles without images/Reptiles

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. There seems to be agreement that this page can be archived and/or marked as historical, without causing any pain to anyone. ‑Scottywong | [babble] || 02:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/Articles without images/Reptiles

 * – (View MfD)

Out of date(2008) project page that has been replaced with categories. Sun Creator(talk) 17:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Should it be marked historical? Was it ever really used?  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. No evidence at WT:WikiProject Tree of Life that this has been discussed with the WikiProject.  No evidence that User:Sun Creator is a member, not listed at WikiProject_Tree_of_Life.  The page was for WikiProject purposes, and should normally be archived, not deleted.  WikiProjects should manage their own subpages.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * See WikiProject#Inappropriate_exclusivity and WP:NOTYOURS. Sun Creator(talk) 22:07, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * What you link to is talking to mainspace content. The page you want to delete is a WikiProject work support page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:12,' 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * All Wikipedia content, are the first three words of WP:NOTYOURS. Sun Creator(talk) 22:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * KEEP. Old WikiProject work pages are not deleted.  They can be archived, but for the record of past activities of the WikiProject, the work pages should not be deleted.  Only delete project pages that should not have been created in the first place.  We do not delete our history.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, horribly out of date, nothing worth keeping. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: per WP:HISTORICAL it could plausibly be useful for project infrastructure so for now just mark as historical with historical.   SITH   (talk)   12:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: per the rationale of SITH. WP:HISTORICAL Wm335td (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Last edit was 2008, and many of the articles on this list now do have images, so it is out-of-date. Ultimately, the purpose of this list has been replaced by categories, which are more dynamic and kept up to date.  Can't see anybody wanting to use this list or it helping any purpose (there are better alternatives in all cases). Britishfinance (talk) 13:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark as historical. Does no harm as a record of how the project was formerly organized, as long as it is cler it is not current. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 04:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.