Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Texas at San Antonio

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject University of Texas at San Antonio


Project has only one member and it never got it going. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  03:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I am inclined to agree.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 19:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete total non-starter, nothing to save here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:19, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is a scope of a single university always too small for a wikiproject?  This one is too small.  No obvious redirect target.  Editors interested in this might be better referred to WikiProject Universities.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Just a vanity project. -- Klein zach  06:57, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * We usually avoid that v word, as it needlessly insults. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Your sensitivity is remarkable. You also object to 'dead' and 'stillborn' right? Any others? -- Klein zach  01:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The decision to avoid the "vanity" word is quite old. It is not helpful to have people in the real world complaining that their first efforts at Wikipedia were rejected as vanity.  I am a little uncomfortable with "dead" (=has no hope of revival?) and "stillborn" (project made with an aim, but no one joined and nothing happened?), but I do not "object".  They seem to be useful in describing good reason for deletion.  I asked somewhere for ideas for different words, but in the absence of replacements, I can work with them.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * My use of 'vanity' is per the technical publishing term, Vanity press etc. IMO it's most appropriate term available. -- Klein zach  02:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.