Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki loves sea turtle monuments

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki loves sea turtle monuments


Another project which never swam. No incoming links except WikiProject directories, and the only edits to the talk page are notices posted by MediaWiki message delivery. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Sea turtles are great swimmers! New images have been added to wikimedia through this project and it does provide a wonderful reference (highly publicized) for everyone, not just wikimedians. A lot of work has been put into this project and we continue updating it. Please don't delete! JennyMed (talk) 14:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC) JennyMed
 * WikiProjects are for collaboration between Wikipedia editors. This page shows no sign of such collaboration, and your defence appears to be that it is of use to people elsewhere.  However, Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site, and you do appear to be using this page as a webhost for your project.  Good luck with your work, but you need to find another way of publicising your project. - Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just because you like the topic of a inactive Wikiproject doesn't mean it has to stay. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 20:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to MEDASSET. Way too specific, and fails WP:NOTADVOCACY. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I don't think a cross-namespace redirect is of any benefit here. &mdash; Train2104 (t • c) 01:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It is not a discouraged WP:CNR, is it a viable WP:ATD that could be applied to all unsuitable and stillborn WikiProjects. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.