Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians who frankly don't care about Jimbo's beard

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete with a copy to BJAODN.

In evaluating this discussion, I merged the three related discussions. Given the topic, it seems to me that an inconsistent result would be the worst possible choice.
 * Wikipedia:Non-main namespace pages for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians who frankly don't care about Jimbo's beard
 * Wikipedia:Non-main namespace pages for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Jimbo's beard
 * Wikipedia:Non-main namespace pages for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians against Jimbo's beard

By strict vote-counting, I get the following: The last line represents the opinions if you took all three discussions and merged them, then eliminated duplication. The fractions come from 2 people who voted differently in the different discussions.

I should also note that 5 of the "keep" voters did so with comments that make it very difficult to tell if they were being serious. Their stated reasons appear to have no connection to the discussion. My hypothesis is that the discussion is about a joke and they consider surreal comments to be humorous and therefore appropriate. Not every culture shares that view, however. I was within a hair's-breadth of putting those comments in the "could not call" column.

Noting that a synopsis is already in the BJAODN archive, I am going to take the last step to delete the pages and the related redirects. Rossami (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikipedians who frankly don't care about Jimbo's beard

 * Bad joke. BJAODN. Andrew pmk | Talk 01:01, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * First, merge all "Beard" VFD's together. Second, keep (and BJAODN) all of them. I'd like to see where this ends up if it's allowed to go on. --Tito xd 01:13, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Temporarily, that is... --Tito xd 01:16, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. same as all the others, non-encyclopedic. Elfguy 01:19, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. agree with Elfguy. Wikipedianinthehouse 01:20, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete amusing while they lasted, but they needn't last. -Splash 02:17, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. *drew 02:49, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN works for me on this one too. FreplySpang (talk) 03:55, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete.   Paul Klenk 04:42, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, useless project, not funny enough for BJADON. &mdash; J I P | Talk 07:28, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mildly funny, slightly embarrassing.  Now make it go away. --Tony Sidaway Talk  07:58, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN, nice parody of the censorship/countercensorship Wikiproject debacle. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 08:55, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN JimboBeardCruft... and for the above reasons --Mysidia (talk) 16:09, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maybe preserve one beard joke as BJAODN, the rest should go. MCB 18:09, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Any objections if I userfy the page (i.e. move it to User:Flcelloguy/...) and leave a redirect to it? Thanks! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 00:46, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but Merge all the Beard projects into one and put into category:Wikipedia:Humour. Thryduulf 10:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all Jimbobeardcruft.--Scimitar parley 16:13, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. --  user:zanimum
 * Speedy keep, don't let the deletionists suppress apathy. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 20:06, 2005 August 29 (UTC)
 * Userfy or BJAODN all three. -Sean Curtin 01:59, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's not part of the encyclopedia per se and it's good for a laugh. --IvanP 19:20, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - since when is humor not permitted? &mdash; Dan | Talk 23:18, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm violently agnostic with regards to Jimbo's beard. I'd support a move to commons though. --fvw *  00:16, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all joke wikiprojects including specifically this one per my reasoning in the related discussion below.Rossami (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lulu. (Though I am a deletionist, I take exception to these bearded cases.) ~ Syrae Faileas - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 21:17, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Humor people :) Ryan Norton T 07:17, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all beard projects. They show Wikipedia isn't as boring as you'd think. :) - ulayiti (talk)   (my RfA)  13:31, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - it has run its course. -- DS1953 03:39, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Merge all three and delete.  Not worthy of BJAODN.  Get back to making an encyclopedia.  revtor07 21:29,  8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.