Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject quality


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete per author request. Steve (Stephen)talk 09:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject quality


I propose that the above page be deleted for the following reasons:
 * 1) Inactivity. The page was created in October 2005 and has been inactive since then (see history). As the project founder is still active, I asked him about the status of the page one week ago, but have received no response.
 * 2) Scope. I'm not sure what the purpose of the page is, but I am quite sure that it is not a WikiProject. Its stated aim is to tie "together inventors, engineers, managers and other heroes who have improved "quality" in its myriad aspects". However, it does not specify a clear scope or even note how (or to what end) it will "tie together" those people. Black Falcon (Talk) 15:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Ill-defined, inactive project. John Carter 15:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Inappropriate as either an article or a WikiProject, and I'm not sure what namespace it was intended to be in. --ais523 16:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I concur with the above assessments. Chiros Sunrider 23:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment: I userfied it. Is that okay? --Uncle Ed 00:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I have no objection to having the page in userspace and deleting the page in the projectspace. Perhaps we can close this MfD via WP:SNOW or WP:CSD (author-requested deletion)? -- Black Falcon (Talk) 03:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete in projectspace, leave it in userspace if you want it. I don't really understand what it is, though. -Amarkov moo! 03:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete  Joe  I  04:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No objection from me to userfication, by the way. --ais523 10:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.