Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia Indexing Scheme/A


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Keep Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 03:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Indexing Scheme/A and Wikipedia Indexing Scheme/B
The main page (Wikipedia Indexing Scheme) has been keep for historical reference, but there is no need for this page and its subpages to be kept. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 18:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - linked from the main historical page and no reason given for deletion. –xenotalk 18:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I know it's not a good argument but it is useless, only the main page could be neccesary. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 18:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I suppose we could subst the material for historical record, and then delete the subpage, but again: where's the net gain? I really am confused that people continue to seek out these project-space pages that are minding their own business and bring them to MFD. Rather than saving space, you cause more space to be used, 1602 bytes and counting so far. –xenotalk 18:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep all. Is at least a record of past efforts, and might even want to be revised.  Navigation remains a problem for readers of wikipedia.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Xeno.  Keeper  |  76  20:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.