Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV


This was a draft version of the page Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV/2008 and hence is an unfinished duplicate and can be deleted. Liz Read! Talk! 19:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Given that the page has five subpages, would it be better to keep it as a hub of sorts linking to those pages? Bosstopher (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Pinging for a response, now that this has been relisted. Is anyone allowed to edit Signpost pages? If so I'd be willing to try and fix it up into a link hub or something. Brustopher (talk) 13:36, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This page is identical to Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV/2008. This is the style for the listing of single-page view issues of the Signpost from 2005-2009 (see Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV/2005, Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV/2006, Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV/2007, Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV/2009). After 2009, the template and format changed to the single page view that the Signpost currently uses (see Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2010-01-04 for example) and there are currently no year indexes after 2009 (at least not yet!).


 * All of the pages that link to this page are coming from user pages, this MfD discussion and this archived talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Archive1. Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV is not a general template used on other pages. Looking at the page history, this page was created in 2007, was started as the 2008 index of single page issues by User:Seattle Skier who later created Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/SPV/2008 which is actually the proper index page for the 2008 year. Liz  Read! Talk! 13:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * To clarify I'm not in support of keeping it in something like its current form, but instead that it be replaced by a simple list of all its subpages. It could increase ease of navigation, as well as avoiding the issue of a page that doesn't exist having 5 subpages. Brustopher (talk) 14:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:14, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, with no prejudice against recreation as a tool for navigation if someone deems it useful. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 10:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * delete, no need to keep this around. Frietjes (talk) 00:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.