Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia can wait


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep--Aervanath (talk) 05:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia can wait
Looks to be an essay which was never written. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC) Keep and improve Strong keep after seeing interest in continuing work on this essay. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 15:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No content. &mdash; Supuhstar  *   §  21:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a parable or a very subtle joke.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has meaning, involves subtlety.  Is a reflective learing tool and is good for the project.  Development may be slow, but that is not a reason to delete.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not opposed to having an essay with this name, it just seems pointless to have this page right now because there hasn't been an edit in the past year, since when it had been created with only the underconstruction tag. Ah, I see that you started the essay. If somebody plans to work on it I think that it should be kept. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to embody eventualism and is actually a good way to describe that point of view, it's probably better if tag as humourous since the page is subtle.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep We can always delete it tomorrow. Vicenarian (talk) 20:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy to creators subpage, Or whoever else wants to expand on it. Then move back once it's complete. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 06:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral/Userfy - We have a lot of essays like this. I'm not sure whether or not the meaning behind this is satirical or if it's complemented by WP:DGAF. Either way, this article isn't quite ready for namespace yet.--WaltCip (talk) 12:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Albeit a Zen-ish essay,  it does not appear to be given a sufficient reason for deletion.  (noting current content) Collect (talk) 14:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with WP:NAM. Bearian (talk) 21:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Not opposed to policy, clever actually, & I intend to quote it. DGG (talk) 02:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.