Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia for World Heritage (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was confusion and chaos. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 18:27, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia for World Heritage


It is common knowledge that Wikipedia is a Digital World Heritage Site, UNESCO having decided this long ago. Delete per an outdated page. benzband ( talk ) 09:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - I think that it is important to have the page. By adding the names it will be easy to keep a note on who ever from en wikipedia has signed it. It will help in spreading awarness. I know that a redirect will be equally helpful but still it is better to have the page. The page will be totally focused in getting suggestions and signs from en wikipedia. The page is not going to bother anyone or will disturb anything. It will be little easy for a en editor to collaborate at a wikiproject on en wikipedia then a page on meta or foundation page.  Yash t  101  :)  09:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Pages can be updated. ~ &#8658;TomTom  N00  @ 11:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * General note: this MfD was intented as an April Fool and a publicity stunt for the cause of WP:WP4WH. In any case, i invented the whole biz about Unesco accepting the petition. Cheers, benzband  ( talk ) 18:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.