Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not omniscient

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. --RL0919 (talk) 20:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not omniscient
Essay created on 10 March 2011. The information is obtuse and lacks meaningful insight. At best, the essay is a strictly personal viewpoint about Wikipedia and does not contain enough advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors to be considered a Wikipedia essays for project namespace. The essay originally was categorized as Wikipedia content policy, which lead to a disparaging disruption on its talk page. Page creator now is block. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 14:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete There are many things that Wikipedia is not (a forum, a social network, a social experiment, censored, a battlegrond, etc.), it makes sense to mention them because there are other pages or institutions that are such things. Not the case here: if we dismiss conspiracy theories, there is no web site or institution at all that is omniscient. There is no Big Brother anywhere in real life MBelgrano (talk) 14:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I was going to suggest userfy, but the user has a history of disruption and whatnot. As the one who led off the talkpage discussion, I think the issue there was an apparent removal and restoration of the "policy" tag. I questioned that tag more because the page seemed so short and incomplete; I have no problem telling people we are not omniscient, as long as it is an honest noting of our fallibility, and not an attempt to disparage the whole encyclopedia. Wabbott9 (talk) 21:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete- as vague blather. Reyk  YO!  21:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Klein zach  05:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. One sentance doesn't equal an Essay anyway. --Kumioko (talk) 13:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.