Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia isn't a good encyclopedia

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete per WP:SNOW. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia isn't a good encyclopedia

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Created by a user who has been blocked per WP:NOTHERE. This essay appears to be nothing more than a list of their own personal gripes and doesn't add anything of value to the project. Kinu t/c 20:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as pollution by a user who was blocked for polluting Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:17, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom CiphriusKane (talk) 12:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 13:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: The hell? This seems like a WP:POINT page created. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 17:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as a completely useless and worthless "essay". —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 06:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: The hell? This seems inappropriate like Westworld and Euphoria. CastJared (talk) 17:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like the creator had an axe to grind. NW1223&lt;Howl at me&bull;My hunts&gt; 01:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is very interesting namespace for an enlightening essay. Somebody should write it. Until then, delete this much lower aiming material. BusterD (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.