Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedians for the conservation of energy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. ( Radiant ) 09:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedians for the conservation of energy
Wikipedia aims to help the world by providing free knowledge, not grouping people who conserve energy. -- Gray  Porpois  e cetaceans have large brains 21:44, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete We already have Category:Wikipedians who support the development of Renewable Energy. If this is somehow different, they need to move this to a category page in Category:Wikipedians. --Wolf530 (talk) 02:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * As per Wolf530 - Either create a user box & then create a catagory attatched to it or delete it... Spawn Man 07:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Wolf530 & Spawn Man. —Doug Bell talk•contrib 19:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advocates a position and irrelevant to the building of an encyclopedia. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 21:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Useless category. What would the alternative be? Wikipedians for wasting energy? JChap2007 03:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a political page not a means of organising edits to articles. Wikiprojects are for organising edits to articles, therefore this is not a valid Wikiproject page. Cynical 12:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Rename to Wikipedians for the conservation of four-momentum. More general. -- Eugène van der Pijll 09:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree now i understand i should never have created this page i am sorry for wasting your time.Cocoaguy 01:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That's okay. I, personally, like for my time to be "wasted", as I have plenty of it, and I get more experience from it. -- Gray  Porpois  e  01:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.