Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedians without a sense of humor

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Nom Withdrawn - Personally I think it should be kept as just a category but hey ho. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 15:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedians without a sense of humor


Could be construed as an attack page, and by the way it is linked to users - there is no indication that they are party to the page (positively or negatively), or even if it is a private joke - the utility of such a page in main space is open to question JarrahTree 13:38, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep- it quite obviously says "Wikipedians who self-identify" right at the top, and was listified from a category that these users had put themselves on. You can quite easily verify this for yourself. Reyk YO! 13:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment having just tagged a lot of self identify categories - even with the self identify property - it still seems a questionable item imho, the attempt to delete it on October 2017 needs to be revisited . JarrahTree 15:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * What lot of self identify categories have you tagged? Did you follow the CFD that led to this?   —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I see you have been creating usercategory talk pages bu posting unsigned NPOV-failing tags. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, no reason to delete. This is a better solution than usercategories.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy - Move to user space. This doesn't need to be in project space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The steady backburner criticism of Wikipedian humour intolerance is definitely not a single Wikipedian thing, and so belongs in project space. I’ve argued that it does not belong well in category space. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:21, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Withdraw nomination - re-read October 2017 CFD material - no further comment JarrahTree 23:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.