Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipediholism test/modern

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep per WP:SNOW. Withdrawn. Catgirllover4ever (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Wikipedia:Wikipediholism test/modern

 * – (View MfD)

Unfunny and overlong "humour" page. Redirect to Wikipediholism test, or mark as historical. Catgirllover4ever (talk) 04:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Withdrawn per WP:SNOW. Catgirllover4ever (talk) 17:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Your subjective opinions on what is funny or not is just as irrelevant as the length of the page. Looks like a nice wiki page that multiple editors are contributing to and is not a disruption or violation of any policy I'm aware of. And it stays on point and relevant to Wikipedia itself. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Funny, in a Wikipedia reflective educational way. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Long-standing page that is evidently appreciated by some parts of the community, per the edit history and talk page. I personally find it very unfunny, but WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid reason for deletion. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Like SpicyMilkBoy, WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.