Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikiproject Fun comment templates

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikiproject Fun comment templates


Bulk-creation of templates by a long-term disruptive user who's about to be formally topic-banned from creating pointless WP:space pages. This MFD also includes all the sub-templates listed on the page, none of which I can envisage any legitimate use for. &#8209; Iridescent 20:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as user is banned and other use is limited. This should also include Guidance which is on that page, and I don't give a created by the same user. Subst the 4 sub-templates with transclusions before deletion, as not to break the user's comments in discussions. &mdash; Train2104 (t • c) 20:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I haven't checked all of them, but the transclusions of But are false positives, caused by there being a template of that name on French Wikipedia and the template thus appearing in text that's been copy-pasted from fr-wiki without removing the templates. &#8209; Iridescent 20:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC) (adding) I've G3 deleted I don't give a, as there's genuinely no good-faith explanation I can possibly think of for creating it—anyone who attempted to use it would find themselves civility-blocked on the spot. &#8209; Iridescent 20:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Userfy Delete page in its current form - it's clearly not a Wikiproject. I have no particular issue with the page being a user subpage, and while I have no qualms with deleting the templates themselves I think usefication would also be acceptable. Primefac (talk) 20:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Updated !vote. Primefac (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete more useless project-space garbage created by this user. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge into Template:Done/See also. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 22:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Move to Fun comment templates &#91;or Userfy to User:Wiki-Pharaoh/Fun comment templates&#93;. Let's not put the cart before the horse: if the templates listed on this page are deleted, then it no longer serves a purpose, and deletion is due. Until then, it serves as pseudo-documentation for the templates (which lack any themselves). — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 13:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * , would it not be better to userfy (i.e. move to User:Wiki-Pharaoh/Fun comment templates)? Given that all of their other WP-space pages have been userfied, I don't see why this one wouldn't be moved there as well. Primefac (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That would be fine with me. I was originally going to suggest that, but has been banned; anecdotally I've generally seen a refrain from userfying things to the userspace of banned users, however, the AN/I thread closure did recommended it. —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 21:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete it all per Blocked indefinitely. Additionally, all project space pages and shortcuts are to be userfied or deleted (at administrator's discretion). That should clearly include silly-templates. Alsee (talk) 20:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: I started a deletion discussion for the templates on this page which is at Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 21 -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 01:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Userfy or Merge project? Negative smiley.svg I would love to, but:lol This needs to go to User page, or Department of Fun. '''P roDuct 0339'''sayworkproj 08:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.