Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Writing articles about underwear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete, trolling, and not the first time someone starts crap related to this and lists it for deletion under another account right away. Just block them and ignore. - Bobet 01:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Writing articles about underwear
I don't get it, what's the point of this essay?? Just can't make head nor tail of this essay, it's bizarre. --Ryalarash2 10:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Sounds like a joke page to me. Just move it to the creator's userspace – Qxz 10:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks like a Colbert-related vandalism/joke page. —Dark•S hik ari [T] 11:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment What does Stephen Colbert have to do with this article?? I don't get it. --sunstar nettalk 12:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be some form of special pleading for the frequently deleted topic of "briefsism" (nothing to do with Colbert), created by an account that has only edited on that topic. Note: If this is deleted, redirects WP:BRIEFS, WP:PANTS, and WP:UNDIES should go too. Gavia immer (talk) 14:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Userfy sounds like a joke page (if that's true Wikipedia has enough established jokes like WP:BJAODN and WP:TOE) or complaint to deletion (that would be belonging to userspace, if not deleted as attack, and this does not seem like an attack). Wooyi 15:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no really, I don't think we need article about briefism here nor do we need an essay about writing an article about briefism. Delete them and the redirects. I also strongly suspect that User:Francis bellhouse the contributor is actually single-purpose-account for trolling as he shows a remarkably good insight in how things works here at wikipedia and asked another user to list briefism articles on deletion review. CharonX /talk 16:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This appears to be a WP:POINT violation; "I don't like the consensus so I'm going to make an essay complaining about it!" -Amarkov moo! 20:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not useful and does not belong in WP namespace.  It's the work of a single-purpose account (see Special:Contributions/Francis_bellhouse), clearly intended for no productive purpose and perhaps to be disruptive.  --Seattle Skier (talk) 22:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete garbage. JuJube 23:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete but seeing as someone will inevitably ask for this on deletion review, I cut and pasted the text into a subpage. I can't see the point of this: but I suspect it may well be a WP:POINT article. --sunstar nettalk 23:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect as above. Hiddenhearts Sign Here! My Talk 01:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.