Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:You should not spread your fetish across Wikipedia

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was userfy. JohnCD (talk) 13:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

You should not spread your fetish across Wikipedia


Unfunny, pointless nonsense that does not benefit Wikipedia in any way. While the author of this article says "you should not spread your fetish across Wikipedia," this essay does the very same thing, namely, self-publicizing his verbal diarrhea solely for his own amusement and to the benefit of none. — Muskie72 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 00:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC).
 * Keep An essay in Wikipedia namespace is not like an article such as SPONGE (Activist Group), and many requirements for an article do not apply to a WP essay. This nomination is obviously retaliation for something, possibly the AfD for SPONGE, and the nominator should be added somewhere at WP:SPI. Johnuniq (talk) 02:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Huh? How is this "obviously in retaliation for something" ?  I fail to see the connection.  Please explain. Muskie72 (talk) 02:36, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The nominator was indeffed two days ago as a block-evading sock. Johnuniq (talk) 08:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Move back to userspace. This contains more personal expression than wisdom for general benefit.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Userfy per SmokeyJoe. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:20, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Userfy. I'm the creator, I have no problem with it being moved back.  And yeah, it probably was one of several people I've been involved with indef-blocking over the years.  Possibly even, by whom the page was inspired.  Also, I'm offended.  "Unfunny"?  C'mon, it's at least a little amusing.  Muskie was 100% correct in that it was written for my own amusement. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 09:48, 12 April 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.