Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:About/New and anonymous editors

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Aasim 04:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:About/New and anonymous editors

 * – (View MfD)
 * Aasim 04:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Implausible subpage in talk namespace: Semi-protected talk pages generally do not have a subpage intended for "new and anonymous editors". Sysages (talk | contribs) 03:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The nominator has a rationale for a page move.  Discuss on the talk page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - In addition to the above, the comments are "interesting" and should be kept in the history rather than redacted. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aasim 04:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong keep as a record of discussion, this should not be delted without a very good reason, and I don't see one here. It perhaps should be moved to a more expected location, but I don't really see a need for that. There is a large link near the top of Wikipedia talk:About, which is semi-protected, inviting users who cannot edit that page to use this page, and it seems that some do. I will have to start monitoring Wikipedia talk:About/New and anonymous editors and providing answers when i can, i think. I think this discussion could be closed at this point, no0 one but the nom has favored deletion. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Still keep. User:Awesome Aasim, what’s with the pointless comment-free relisting?  All it does is reshuffle, which removes it from the backlog where visibility is higher!  Relisting should be reserved for where there is a purpose to relisting, such as new information, or to call back early participants to answer later participants, and in these cases there is necessarily a meaningful resorting comment. Otherwise, the mfd list shuffling is just annoying.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * @SmokeyJoe Thanks for letting me know. I was not sure if 2 votes was strong enough consensus, that is why I relisted.  I guess this can be closed as "Keep". Aasim 04:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.