Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Živorad Janković

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  redirect. (non-admin closure) Oiyarbepsy (talk) 20:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Živorad Janković


Draft article already created in draftspace and already published at Živorad Janković. It seems like there's different editors so I don't see the need for a history merge. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Živorad Janković. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as not needed and not useful. Need to clear stale draft backlog. Legacypac (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * needs is an extreme requirement met by almost nothing in the project. "Not useful" is absurdly false.  There is content in the draft that is different to content in the mainspace article.  Comparison of different sources is always useful in any level of scholarship.  There is no "need to clear stale draft backlog", that is a false premise supporting busywork, and I dispute that this draft is "stale", it does not contain maintain that is no longer accurate.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as unlikely needed. SwisterTwister   talk  06:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not required, get rid. JMHamo (talk) 23:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Živorad Janković. North America1000 16:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Živorad Janković. This is the standard way of dealing with duplications. No reason to delete. 103.6.159.92 (talk) 13:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to mainspace article. This is the standard way to deal with a duplication in userspace. Please read the instructions at the top of the "Miscellany for deletion" page (the page you are looking at now): "Note that we do not delete user subpages merely to "clean up" userspace. Please only nominate pages that are problematic under our guidelines." And under WP:STALE, stale drafts should only be deleted if "problematic even if blanked," which is not true here.Fagles (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.