Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Medusa (artwork)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete (OK to restore for export purposes requested by anyone, then re-delete). — xaosflux  Talk 02:19, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Medusa (artwork)


Draft from October 2013 of a non-notable work by a non-notable artist. Last edited a few months ago but it was not tagged under AFC so it wouldn't be subject to G13. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to http://art.wikia.com/
 * This can be disheartening. This is a beautiful article, well worked, it should be published (maybe it is?), but WP:Alternative outlets applies. I have spent 15 minutes on this, it looks like something that should be sent to mainspace, but it is not.  It has no independent sources, and it will have no chance of not being deleted.  Beautiful well-intentioned draft though.   --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm good with that. I'm not sure how the transwiki licensing works. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it means "delete and email on request", the original author has to re-upload and re-assert copyrights right to do so. Wikia.com is way more soft on copyrights compliance than Wikipedia.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.