Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mitchell Spencer

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Deleted per WP:G10. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mitchell Spencer


Very stale rejected WP:AFC submission. Subject does not appear to be at all notable, effectively unsourced. Towards the end it contains a serious violation of BLP Policy. Article should be deleted both to rememdy the BLP violation and out of respect for the privacy of the subject, who is still a minor. Monty 845  04:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment If this does not qualify as a speedy delete then I need a very strong drink. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 21:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete (I stand corrected, SmokeyJoe. Strong drink imbibed) - Fails WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:OR, WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:HOAX and WP:BULLSHIT. There's the possibility this was written about a friend/enemy of the creator and it should be deleted with extreme prejudice. Can we at least get a SNOWBALL? ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 02:12, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a serious submission.  Child BLP issues.  Unsourced, unreliable, irresponsible content.  Sorry, not speediable, except as A7 if in article space.  CSD criterion do not cover all slam-dunk deletions.  If guess that this sort of thing, outside of article space, is not speediable because it fails new criteria criterion #3 “Frequent”.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:49, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD as an unsourced biography of a living person which appears to be a mixture of either jokes, hoaxes, or attacks on the subject. (And it's about a minor, to boot.) The "sources" cited are completely irrelevant to this subject. I don't begrudge Suriel their strong drink, but this does qualify as a speedy delete, and I am going to tag it as such. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:16, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I can see that you might consider it to be G10, entirely self-disparagement, or impersonation of a person engaging in self-disparagement. I considered that it doesn't meet G1, G2 or A7.  Speedy delete.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.