Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nelly Kaplan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was merge to Nelly Kaplan. JohnCD (talk) 11:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nelly Kaplan


Please see this permalink where, in the final section, the original author requests deletion. My view is that a simple CSD because the author has requested it is not available here since several others have edited the draft. Equally, it is unlikely that further editors will pick this up and run with it since it is in the WP:AFC process. I am making a neutral nomination on behalf of the originating author Fiddle   Faddle  06:31, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The subject is clearly Notable. Inline citations are required only for contentious claims in BLP articles. The draft is actually acceptable "as is" and should be moved to mainspace, not deleted. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment I suggest that, if or another editor commits to accepting this as an article then this be closed to reflect that and the item is given its chance in main namespace. I have simply nominated it to embrace the original author;s wishes while it is in WP:AFC space. I will not express an opinion on the draft or in this discussion, and I recuse myself from reviewing it.  Fiddle   Faddle  19:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - Is this the same person as Nelly Kaplan? There appears to be some overlap. If so, merging would be appropriate. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 14:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * There seems to be an overlap. There is also a commonality between the username of the author here and the name of the author of a paper cited there. Certainly an outcome to merge has merit. Fiddle   Faddle  14:15, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with Merge. -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:19, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.