Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Winki

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. BencherliteTalk 21:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Winki


Not notable. The creator of the article (MarkWanted; talk) said this, which was insulting:

Enjoy your power of rejection Minna no sora no shita. I know which site im not going to be donating to ever again.

みんな空の下 (トーク) 06:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)


 * partial blank This retort could have easily been blanked, and it is not so seriously offensive that deletion is needed. Another option is revision deletion of the silly comment.  However I can also understand repeated declines for a reason that is not accurate causes frustration.  The topic is not web content but looks to be software instead. However I still agree that the topic is not notable.  So overall I am suggesting blanking the offending text rather than deleting, and leave it declined. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:48, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, partially blank the insults, and fully protect if there are more insults. The page can be speedy deleted if unedited in six months per db-afc. (If anyone attempts to game the system by making trivial edits every few months that don't improve the page, then I recommend renominating this page for deletion in six months. I am certain the consensus will be to delete.) I agree with that the subject is non-notable. But because this was recently created, the page is not promotional, and db-afc exists, I see no harm in letting it stay for now to allow the creator to continue working on it if he can find reliable sources about the subject. (I myself have searched for sources on Google News Archive and have been unable to find substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.) Cunard (talk) 08:19, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Five declined submissions, no indication of available source material per this discussion - what are we hanging on to? -- Jreferee (talk) 02:42, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Jreferee. This is junk. --BDD (talk) 16:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.